Grossman, "Dostoevskii" - Authoritative and hard-hitting biography of Dostoevsky from the Soviet Union.

Grossman. biography of Dostoevsky

Grossman's "Dostoevskii" Summary and Comments - Authoritative and hard-hitting biography of Dostoevsky from the Soviet Union.

Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881)Wikipedia.

Today we introduce Leonid Grossman's "Dostoevskyi," translated by Nobuyuki Kitagaki and published by Chikuma Shobo.

This biography is quite hard-hitting, as you can see from the picture on the cover.

The author, Grossman, was a prominent Soviet scholar born in Odessa in 1888, and this biography, first published in 1963, is considered definitive with a second edition that was substantially revised by the author in 1965.

The distinctive feature of the biography by Grossman comes from the fact that he is precisely this Soviet scholar. Let me quote from the afterword.

Grossman's biography is based on an abundance of original documents, as well as newly discovered materials, knowledge accumulated over many years, and facts obtained directly from Dostoevsky's wife.

Chikuma Shobo Publishing Company, translation by Nobuyuki Kitagaki, Leonid Grossman, "Dostoevskyi," p. 429

The Soviet Union has a vast amount of Dostoevsky materials preserved. Moreover, new materials have been discovered over time, and the ease of access to these materials is clearly different from that of researchers in other countries.

I have read and compared various biographies, and Grossman's biography is described differently from other biographies, and how do you know all that? I have read and compared various biographies of Grossman.

In the scene where Dostoevsky was detained as a political prisoner and interrogated by the Secret Board of Inquiry, even the faces of the interrogators are described in detail. I was surprised at this. I thought that in the Soviet Union, not only the names of secret interrogators, but even their faces and detailed interactions were recorded in the documents.

Although it is not clear which source this is from, I believe that this uniquely detailed description is one of the features of this biography.

There is also another feature of this biography. The same is quoted from the afterword.

(The distinctive features of Grossman's research methods are his parallelism of authors with the culture of their time, his consideration of literary phenomena in relation to other artistic fields such as painting, music, architecture, and theater, and his strong interest in the creative psychology and individuality of writers.

Chikuma Shobo Publishing Company, translation by Nobuyuki Kitagaki, Leonid Grossman, "Dostoevskyi," p. 428.

This was a very gratifying read. It was one of the pieces of information I was very interested in knowing about what literature Dostoevsky was influenced by at the time. This biography gives us a focus on what Dostoevsky read, what he thought about, and what he created from it.

In that sense, this biography, as hard-looking as it is, may be a very useful biography when trying to study Dostoevsky.

In fact, we often see Dostoevsky books from which this biography is cited. It also seems to have a well-established reputation as a basic research document.

The book is large in size, and both the content and text are solid, so I would not recommend it as a casual read, but I think it could be an important resource for research.

These are Leonid Grossman's "Dostoevskii.

Click here for the Dostoevsky Database
.Dostoevsky Chronology and List of Works - A quick look at Dostoevsky's life
.List of recommended Dostoevsky biographies - Read the biography and you will love Dostoevsky.
.List of recommended Dostoevsky commentaries - Read this to make Dostoevsky's works more interesting!
.List of recommended commentaries on Dostoevsky and Christianity - What you should know about Dostoevsky if you are interested in him!

Next Article.

Click here to read the previous article.

Related Articles

HOME

2 件のコメント

  • I am 46 years old. Since the family grave is in a temple, my father may belong to some sect of Buddhism, but there is no sign of faith in his daily life, and I do not follow any religion other than Buddhism.
    It is difficult to explain why people are alive, but I think the reason for not wanting to die (or experience pain) is common to many people. I think there was a line in "Evil Spirits" that goes something like "imagine a big stone on top of you." I think it is undeniable that we want to live because we want to avoid such circumstances. Living because we don't want to die is a passive way of life. The world will be filled with suicides as soon as we are no longer willing to die.
    Whether Christianity, Buddhism, or any other religion, there are a number of explanations about the afterlife. For example, with regard to Buddhism, I have had the experience of having the meaning of the Buddhist memorial service explained to me at the time of the 49th memorial service. I feel that such "ways of thinking" and "ways of understanding" have the effect of easing the fear of death.
    My personal feeling is that the totality of people's feelings about something similar to God or Buddha, or their beliefs related to them, is my personal conscience. I feel that there are many different theories in many different religions, trying to convince people or get them. I think there are people who give because there are people who want. I think that is fine. But I am one of those people who don't want it, so I read Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Proust. I don't have the experience of seeing books as people do, but I feel that various monogatari are accumulating at the bottom of my consciousness.
    I am a businessman, and the criteria for living in society are efficiency (or productivity) and legal compliance. When I go out with my family, the first criterion for choosing between car travel and public transportation is the money it costs. It is the cost of gasoline vs. train fare. Efficiency permeates family life.
    But I feel that humans do not live only on bread, and that the "source of feelings" is the driving force, and that the bottom of that source is connected to the bottom of consciousness, and that the monographies of Raskolnikov, Lyovin, and Proust are all mixed together and accumulated.
    I seem to have stopped thinking at some point. Instead of Shinran or Dostoevsky descending into the depths after asking themselves, I seem to expect my conscience to remain my conscience by hoarding the monogatarios of many others in my depths.
    I don't have anything to believe in like God or Buddha, and therefore, it seems that I did not go on a quest, but Mr. Ueda is still young and seems to have a willingness to ask himself questions in his writings. I am a little envious of you, and I too have been able to do some self-confirmation through writing. I am worried that I might define myself in this way, but since something might arise dialectically, I decided to close my eyes and call it even.
    Everyday miscellaneous things, things that seem useless, but when you stare at them closely, they seem to have meaning. If we assign meaning to each of these things, we would feel that there is not enough time for human beings to live. But I feel that humans have the ability to skip over the meaning and let it seep into our feelings (into our consciousness). For this reason I need monogatari, and I feel that I have set a vague standard of judgment, which I named conscience, as my heart's stick.
    As a Buddhist monk, I think that you are in a position to put something ambiguous into words and explain it to many people, which is why blogs such as this one play such an important role. I look forward to reading more.

    • Satomi Madoka, nice to meet you. My name is Takahiro Ueda of Kinsenji Temple.
      Thank you for your comment. I am very happy to hear you say so.
      I will continue to do my best to keep my original intention in mind.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CAPTCHA


    ABOUT US

    Profile
    Takahiro UedaPriest, Kinshokuji Temple, Kibe sect of Shinshu
    Shinshu Kibenha Hakodate Kinshokuji/ Takahiro Ueda/ In 2019, he toured 13 countries in 80 days under the theme "What is Religion? After that, he wrote a round-the-world trip report and serialized "Thinking about Life and Peace: The Countries of the World Where Monks Walked" in 9 newspapers in Japan/ Loves reading and coffee/ Loves to read and drink coffee. He writes articles from the perspective of a monk who has studied religious studies, ranging from simple questions about temples to the question of what religion is all about.